Spanish class debate inquiry project
Driving Question: "Should we make English the national language of the U.S.?"
Students will do research on the argument of their side before the debate. Since students are residents of this country, they would be affected by this change. Students must strongly defend their answer to this question especially because the controversy is emotionally charged. The first part of the activity includes a presentation so each side can understand a little of the background of the other side. Students will evaluate and analyze their peers by asking questions so they must always be prepared to respond. The driving question also offers many underlying questions that the students must think about. Including: “Do people alienate themselves when they refuse to learn English in the US?”, “Is learning English actually necessary to survive in this country?”, “How might not knowing the commonly used language in your country of residence disable you from participating in the government as a citizen?” There is already much debate to this question so as a class we will weigh the pros and cons of each side to try to come to some kind of consensus or important take-aways.
Grabber: Article retrieved from https://newsela.com/articles/english-laws/id/4807/
This article explains how different states have already started to deal with non-English speakers in the political scene, where they only allow political documents to be written in English. This is a high emotion situation because some people may feel disenfranchised if official documents are only allowed in English. Students may discuss the article in groups after reading it and may ask questions like "Is this really a good idea if we want people to learn English? What are some alternatives to this route?"
The grabber would be used right at the introduction of the lesson for the debate. The grabber is meant to get students thinking about some right and wrong ways that the US deals with non-English native speakers and whether it is truly necessary for them to learn English in our country.
Culminating activity: Class Debate and mini presentations
Students will be divided into two groups to collaborate and research (it is recommended for the teacher to supplement articles and websites for student research) and briefly present (2-3 min) material based on which side of the argument they are assigned, because an important part of having a good debate is to prepare well. Rubric for the presentations:
Presentation rubric |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Content |
Presentation barely covers the main points of the argument and includes mostly subjective views as evidence. |
Presentation covers some of the main points of the argument and only some evidence is factual |
Presentation covers most of the main points of the argument and most evidence is factual |
Presentation covers the main points of the argument and all evidence is factual |
Engagement |
Presentation includes no audio/visual engagement |
Presentation includes little audio/visual engagement |
Presentation includes some audio/visual engagement |
Presentation includes much audio/visual engagement |
Time limit |
Presentation is more than or less than 1 minute away from the time limit |
Presentation is more than or less than 45 seconds away from the time limit |
Presentation is more than or less than 30 seconds away from the time limit |
Presentation is within the 2-3 minute time limit |
The debate should have different platforms (points in their argument) regarding different reasons why they think English should or shouldn’t be our national language. Once each side presents their evidence, we will have a class debate where the purpose is to come to a conclusion as a class, what would be the best answer to the DQ. Rubric for the debate:
Debate rubric |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Participation |
Student does not participate at all |
Student participates by speaking once or twice or within the smaller group |
Student participates by speaking to the entire class multiple times, sometimes involved in the current conversation |
Student is actively involved in the conversation and can give credible responses to others. |
Response to questions |
Student responds to questions in an irrelevant or insufficient manner |
Student responses are somewhat relevant and partially answer the question. |
Student response is relevant and mostly answers the question. |
Student response is complete, thought through and relevant. |