Science Lab Process Rubric—Middle School
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Question: Problem/Purpose of Lab |
The question is complex and multidimensional, and the purpose of the lab is clearly identified and stated. |
The question is complex, and the purpose of the lab is clear and stated. |
The question is simplistic, and the purpose of the lab is stated but unclear. |
The question and purpose are stated very poorly. OR The question and purpose do not make sense. |
Hypothesis |
The hypothesis includes the required components of a hypothesis with evidence of research, using an I think…because... or If...then... statement. |
The hypothesis is stated in a manner that shows understanding of a hypothesis. The hypothesis is backed with some research. |
The hypothesis includes only one of two required components. |
The hypothesis is not acceptable because neither of the components are included. |
Materials |
The plan specifically lists all the materials used in the lab with proper names and exact amounts of items. |
The plan lists all materials, but some items may not be fully described. |
The plan lists most of the materials, but some items are inaccurately described or missing. |
The plan is missing many materials, or many of the materials are described inaccurately. |
Procedure |
The procedure is described so it could be replicated exactly, including detailed step-by-step instructions. |
The procedure is well-written and includes step-by-step instructions. |
The procedure generally makes sense but the steps are not always clear. Some assumptions need to be made to carry out the experiment. |
The procedure is confusing and missing many steps. |
Description of Results |
The results of the lab are described accurately and in detail with graphs, data charts, pictures, logs, and so forth.
|
The results of the lab are accurately documented in multiple ways.
|
The results of the lab are superficially documented in only one format.
|
The results of the lab do little to describe what happened.
|
Calculations |
Appropriate calculation methods are used, and the results are presented clearly and accurately. |
Appropriate calculation methods are used, and the results are presented accurately. |
Inappropriate calculation methods are used. OR Some calculations contain errors. |
Calculating work is not shown. OR Inappropriate calculation methods result in inaccurate conclusions. |
Conclusion: Hypothesis |
The conclusion reflects a thorough analysis of the hypothesis and makes logical connections between the hypothesis and the experiment. |
The conclusion makes connections between the hypothesis and the experiment. |
The conclusion makes superficial connections between the hypothesis and the experiment. |
No connections are made between the results and process of the experiment. |
Conclusion: Variables |
The explanations of all the variables are clear and support the conclusion. |
Most variables are identified, analyzed, and explained. |
Some variables are identified but may not be analyzed or explained. |
Variables are not identified. |
Conclusion: Findings |
The findings are thoroughly grounded in the results of the experiment and are enhanced by additional research. |
The findings are grounded in the results of the experiment, but some minor points are overlooked or misinterpreted. |
The findings are somewhat grounded in the results of the experiment, but some important points are overlooked or misinterpreted. |
The findings do not appear to be grounded in the results of the experiment. |