Publishers

Tim Vines added Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014

Tim Vines added Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature

Tim Vines added ARRIVE has not ARRIVEd: Support for the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments) guidelines does not improve the reporting quality of papers in animal welfare, analgesia or anesthesia

Tim Vines added Two Years Later: Journals Are Not Yet Enforcing the ARRIVE Guidelines on Reporting Standards for Pre-Clinical Animal Studies

Tim Vines added Open Access Target Validation Is a More Efficient Way to Accelerate Drug Discovery

Tim Vines added Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs

Tim Vines added Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals

Tim Vines added Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article

OER LIBRARIAN added Rigor Champions and Resources

OER LIBRARIAN added Open Access Directory

OER LIBRARIAN added COS Registered Reports Portal

OER LIBRARIAN added Being a Reviewer or Editor for Registered Reports

OER LIBRARIAN added DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies

OER LIBRARIAN added A consensus-based transparency checklist

OER LIBRARIAN added An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard Psychology literature with Registered Reports

OER LIBRARIAN added Evaluating Registered Reports: A Naturalistic Comparative Study of Article Impact

OER LIBRARIAN added A Short Introduction to the Reproducibility Debate in Psychology

OER LIBRARIAN added Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

OER LIBRARIAN added Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations

OER LIBRARIAN added How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?