Learning Domain: Ratios and Proportional Relationships

Standard: Understand the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe a ratio relationship between two quantities.

Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)

Learning Domain: Ratios and Proportional Relationships

Standard: Use ratio and rate reasoning to solve real-world and mathematical problems.

Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)

Learning Domain: Ratios and Proportional Relationships

Standard: Understand the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe a ratio relationship between two quantities. For example, "The ratio of wings to beaks in the bird house at the zoo was 2:1, because for every 2 wings there was 1 beak."ť "For every vote candidate A received, candidate C received nearly three votes."ť

Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)

Learning Domain: Ratios and Proportional Relationships

Standard: Use ratio and rate reasoning to solve real-world and mathematical problems, e.g., by reasoning about tables of equivalent ratios, tape diagrams, double number line diagrams, or equations.

Degree of Alignment:
Not Rated
(0 users)

Cluster: Understand ratio concepts and use ratio reasoning to solve problems

Standard: Understand the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe a ratio relationship between two quantities. For example, “The ratio of wings to beaks in the bird house at the zoo was 2:1, because for every 2 wings there was 1 beak.” “For every vote candidate A received, candidate C received nearly three votes.”

Degree of Alignment:
2 Strong
(3 users)

Cluster: Understand ratio concepts and use ratio reasoning to solve problems

Standard: Use ratio and rate reasoning to solve real-world and mathematical problems, e.g., by reasoning about tables of equivalent ratios, tape diagrams, double number line diagrams, or equations.

Degree of Alignment:
1.3 Limited
(3 users)

on Mar 27, 03:01am Evaluation

## CCSS.Math.Content.6.RP.A.3: Limited (1)

We noticed there were some typos in the lesson. For example, the number of the items are out of order. Also are the ratios in the table for item 5 intentionally incorrect? We felt this was not clear. Is there a line of reasoning which is missing?

on Mar 27, 03:01am Evaluation

## Quality of Explanation of the Subject Matter: Limited (1)

Multiplicative reasoning is stated, but not really dealt with in a way where students work on developing their understanding of it, unless the teacher knows to do it on his/her own, through questioning. Perhaps more teacher notes are needed?

on Mar 27, 03:01am Evaluation

## CCSS.Math.Content.6.RP.A.3: Limited (1)

The activity is good, but there seems to be errors in #5, which affected my rating.

on Mar 27, 03:01am Evaluation

## Quality of Explanation of the Subject Matter: Limited (1)

Although there is an explanation, there isn't enough depth.